Marges après prostatectomie totale : aspects techniques et valeur pronostique

25 avril 2007

Auteurs : Cyrille Bastide, Michel Soulié, Jean-Louis Davin, Dominique Rossi
Référence : Prog Urol, 2007, 2, 17, 182-188


Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Cliquer ici pour le visualiser


Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., Goto Y., Scardino P.T. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J. Urol. 1995 ;  154 : 1818-1824 [cross-ref]
Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Seay T.M., Martin S.K., Slezak J.M., Bergstralh E.J., Zincke H. Pathologie classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status Cancer 1998 ;  82 : 902-908 [cross-ref]
Ajcc Cancer Staging Manual  : Springer (2002). 
Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Bergstralh E.J., Slezak J.M., Martin S.K., Amling C.L., Zincke H. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outeome after radical prostatectomy Urology 1997 ;  50 : 733-739 [inter-ref]
Watson R.B., Civantos F., Soloway M.S. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy : detailed pathological analysis and prognosis Urology 1996 ;  48 : 80-90 [inter-ref]
Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Civantos F., Soloway M.S. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy : the influence of site and number on progression J. Urol. 2002 ;  167 : 2453-2456 [cross-ref]
Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J. Urol. 1998 ;  160 : 299-315 [cross-ref]
Guillonneau B., El-Fettouh H., Baumert H., Cathelineau X., Doublet J.D., Fromont G., Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : oncological evaluation after 1, 000 cases a Montsouris Institute J. Urol. 2003 ;  169 : 1261-1266 [cross-ref]
Cheng L., Slezak J., Bergstralh E.J., Myers R.P., Zincke H., Bostwick D.G. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy J. Clin. Oncol. 2000 ;  18 : 2862-2868
Emerson R.E., Koch M.O., Jones T.D., Daggy J.K., Juliar B.E., Cheng L. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specifie antigen recurrence J. Clin. Pathol. 2005 ;  58 : 1028-1032 [cross-ref]
Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., Scardino P.T. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1, 000 consecutive patients J. Urol. 2002 ;  167 : 528-534 [cross-ref]
Tigrani V.S., Bhargava V., Shinohara K., Presti J.C. Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy Urology 1999 ;  54 : 689-693 [inter-ref]
Sebe P., Makhoul B., Audet J.F., Chopin D., Abbou C.C., Salomon L. Prognostic value of the localization of positive resection margins after radical prostatectomy for intraprostatic tumors Prog. Urol. 2003 ;  13 : 425-429
Rassweiler J., Schulze M., Teber D., Marrero R., Seemann O., Rumpelt J., Frede T. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique : oncological results in the first 500 patients J. Urol. 2005 ;  173 : 761-764 [cross-ref]
Kausik S.J., Blute M.L., Sebo T.J., Leibovich B.C., Bergstralh E.J., Slezak J., Zincke H. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy Cancer 2002 ;  95 : 1215-1219 [cross-ref]
Salomon L., Anastasiadis A.G., Levrel O., Katz R., Saint F., De La Taille A., Cicco A., Vordos D., Hoznek A., Chopin D., Abbou C.C. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer Urology 2003 ;  61 : 386-390 [inter-ref]
Hall G.S., Kramer C.E., Epstein J.I. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1992 ;  16 : 315-324 [cross-ref]
Stamey T.A., Sozen T.S., Yemoto C.M., Mcneal J.E. Classification of localized untreated prostate cancer based on 791 men treated only with radical prostatectomy : common ground for therapeutic trials and TNM subgroups J. Urol. 1998 ;  159 : 2009-2012 [cross-ref]
Salomon L., Levrel O., De La Taille A., Hoznek A., Chopin D., Abbou C.C. Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Prog. Urol. 2002 ;  12 : 628-634
Korman H.J., Leu P.B., Huang R.R., Goldstein N.S. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach ? J Urol. 2002 ;  168 : 991-994 [cross-ref]
Boccon-Gibod L.Ravery V., Vordos D., Toublanc M., Delmas V., Boccon-Gibod L. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions J. Urol. 1998 ;  160 : 1383-1385 [cross-ref]
Obek C., Sadek S., Lai S., Civantos F., Rubinowicz D., Soloway M.S. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy : anatomic site-specific pathologie analysis and impact on prognosis Urology 1999 ;  54 : 682-688 [cross-ref]
Weldon V.E., Tavel F.R., Neuwirth H., Cohen R. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specifie antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy J. Urol. 1995 ;  153 : 1570-1571
Harris M.J. Radical perineal prostatectomy : cost efficient, outeome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management Eur. Urol. 2003 ;  44 : 303-308 [cross-ref]
Curto F., Benljts J., Pansadoro A., Barmoshe S., Hoepffner J.L., Mugnier C., Piechaud T., Gaston R. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : our technique Eur. Urol. 2006 ;  49 : 344-352 [cross-ref]
Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Schlesselman J.J., Soloway M.S. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy J. Clin. Oncol. 2002 ;  20 : 1853-1858 [cross-ref]
Palisaar R.J., Noldus J., Graefen M., Erbersdobler A., Haese A., Huland H. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure Eur. Urol. 2005 ;  47 : 176-184 [cross-ref]
Smith R.C., Partin A.W., Epstein J.I., Brendler C.B. Extended followup of the influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and extensive capsular perforation J. Urol. 1996 ;  156 : 454-458 [cross-ref]
Poon M., Ruckle H., Bamshad B.R., Tsai C., Webster R., Lui P. Radical retropubic prostatectomy : bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction J. Urol. 2000 ;  163 : 194-198 [cross-ref]
Srougi M., Nesrallah L.J., Kauffmann J.R., Nesrallah A., Leite K.R. Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy : a randomized prospective trial J. Urol. 2001 ;  165 : 815-818 [cross-ref]
Lowe B.A. Comparison of bladder neck preservation to bladder neck resection in maintaining post-prostatectomy urinary continence Urology 1996 ;  48 : 889-893 [inter-ref]
Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A., De La Taille A., Antiphon P., Abbou C.C. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation J. Urol. 2003 ;  169 : 2049-2052 [cross-ref]
Villers A. Radical prostatectomy-Bladder neck dissection and urethrovesical anastomosis Prog. Urol. 2005 ;  15 : 1111-1112
Deliveliotis C., Protogerou V., Alargof E., Varkarakis J. Radical prostatectomy : bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing--effects on continence and positive margins Urology 2002 ;  60 : 855-858 [inter-ref]
Shelfo S.W., Obek C., Soloway M.S. Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy : impact on pathologie outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence Urology 1998 ;  51 : 73-78 [inter-ref]
Bianco F.J., Grignon D.J., Sakr W.A., Shekarriz B., Upadhyay J., Dornelles E., Pontes J.E. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation : impact of a positive margin Eur. Urol. 2003 ;  43 : 461-466 [cross-ref]
Soloway M.S., Neulander E. Bladder-neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy Semin. Urol. Oncol. 2000 ;  18 : 51-56
Karakiewicz P.I., Eastham J.A., Graefen M., Cagiannos L., Stricker P.D., Klein E., Cangiano T., Schroder F.H., Scardino P.T., Kattan M.W. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer : multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients Urology 2005 ;  66 : 1245-1250 [inter-ref]
Grossfeld G.D., Chang J.J., Broering J.M., Miller D.P., Yu J., Flanders S.C., Henning J.M., Stier D.M., Carroll P.R. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment : data from the CaPSURE database J. Urol. 2000 ;  163 : 1189-1190
Epstein J.I., Pizov G., Walsh P.C. Correlation of pathologie findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy Cancer 1993 ;  71 : 3582-3593 [cross-ref]
Connolly S.S., O’toole G.C., O’malley K.J., Manecksha R., O’brien A., Mulvin D.W., Quinlan D.M. Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact ? Scand J. Urol. Nephrol. 2004 ;  38 : 26-31 [cross-ref]
Vordos D., Ravery V., Toublanc M., Boccon-Gibod L.Delmas V., Boccon-Gibod L. Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue Prog. Urol. 1998 ;  8 : 232-239
Khan M.A., Partin A.W., Mangold L.A., Epstein J.I., Walsh P.C. Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologie stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer Urology 2003 ;  62 : 866-871 [inter-ref]
Aydin H., Tsuzuki T., Hernandez D., Walsh P.C., Partin A.W., Epstein J.I. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression Urology 2004 ;  64 : 551-555 [inter-ref]
Debras B., Guillonneau B., Bougaran J., Chambon E., Vallancien G. Prognostic significance of seminal vesicle invasion on the radical prostatectomy specimen. Rationale for seminal vesicle biopsies Eur. Urol. 1998 ;  33 : 271-277 [cross-ref]
Sofer M., Savoie M., Kim S.S., Civantos F., Soloway M.S. Biochemical and pathological predictors of the recurrence of prostatic adenocarcinoma with seminal vesicle invasion J. Urol. 2003 ;  169 : 153-156 [cross-ref]
Tefilli M.V., Gheiler E.X., Tiguert R., Banerjee M., Sakr W., Grignon D.J., Pontes J.E., Wood D.P. Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer J. Urol. 1998 ;  160 : 802-806 [cross-ref]
Masterson T.A., Pettus J.A., Middleton R.G., Stephenson R.A. Isolated seminal vesicle invasion imparts better outeomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer : prognostic stratification of pt3b disease by nodal and margin status Urology 2005 ;  66 : 152-155 [inter-ref]
Cheng L., Darson M.F., Bergstralh E.J., Slezak J., Myers R.P., Bostwick D.G. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma Cancer 1999 ;  86 : 1775-1782 [cross-ref]
Freedland S.J., Aronson W., Presti J.C., Kane C.J., Terris M.K., Elashoff D., Amling C.L.The SEARCH Database Study Group Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database J. Urol. 2003 ;  169 : 2142-2146 [cross-ref]
Serni S., Masieri L., Minervint A., Lapin1 A., Nesi G., Carmi M. Cancer progression after anterograde radical prostatectomy for pathologic Gleason score 8 to 10 and influence of concomitant variables Urology 2006 ;  67 : 373-378 [inter-ref]
Lau W.K., Bergstralh E.J., Blute M.L., Slezak J.M., Zincke H. Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer : influence of concomitant pathological variables J. Urol. 2002 ;  167 : 117-122 [cross-ref]
Mian B.M., Troncoso P., Okihara K., Bhadkamkar V., Johnston D., Reyes A.O., Babaian R.J. Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone J. Urol. 2002 ;  167 : 1675-1680 [cross-ref]

© 2007 
Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.